In a paper recently published in the journal SLEEP (2010;33(3):335-342), a group of researchers from the University of California at Berkeley report a very provocative finding: being sleep deprived makes it harder to read emotions on strangers' faces.
Who they studied: 37 young (age 18-25), healthy adults who were randomly assigned to either total sleep deprivation (no sleep at all for one night) followed by two nights of recovery sleep or three nights of restful sleep. The group was mostly female (21/35) and, importantly, the authors did not report the ethnicities of the participants.
What they did: To measure ability to detect emotions, subjects were shown a series of pictures of a face that was either (a) Sad, (b) Angry, or (c) Happy. The intensity of the emotions on the face varied from "definitely neutral" to "definitely happy" (or angry or sad). All pictures were of the same person and were in black and white, taken from the standard set of faces developed by Ekman. Importantly, all subjects knew which emotion was being shown -- they were just supposed to rate how intense the emotion was. Presumably, if the rating was more neutral, they saw less of that emotion in the face.
What they found: Across all emotions, in general, the sleep-deprived group was less able to pick up on the intensity of the emotions used -- they were more likely to rate the faces more neutral overall. With respect to specific emotions, the effect was largest for the Angry and Happy faces. In both cases, both groups could identify the most extreme faces at the same rate, but those faces that were not extreme were generally rated as more neutral by those that are sleep deprived. All of these effects disappeared after 1 night of recovery.
What do the findings mean? After a night of no sleep, you tend to see other people's faces as less emotionally intense than if you had slept. And this difference will go away once you get a good night of rest. So if someone is very angry (potentially a dangerous situation), you are less likely to be able to tell. Also if someone is happy, you will be less likely to tell that as well.
Some questions that remain:
1. Since we know that certain cultures are more sensitive to facial emotions, how do these results apply across cultures?
2. Since the subjects in this study were all young, healthy college-aged people, how much of this also applies to adults over 25?
3. Since the only sleep deprivation condition was total sleep deprivation, how does this apply to partial sleep deprivation -- where you get less sleep than you need, but more than none at all?
Paper: Sleep Deprivation Impairs the Accurate Recognition of Human Emotions
Authors: Els van der Helm, MSc; Ninad Gujar, MSc; Matthew P. Walker, PhD
Link: http://www.journalsleep.org/ViewAbstract.aspx?pid=27729
Friday, April 9, 2010
Wednesday, March 31, 2010
Sleep and Nutrition
A number of studies have found a connection between shorter sleep durations and increased risk of obesity (and diabetes), especially in women. Some have even gone into detail showing that short sleepers were more likely to show abnormalities in hormones that control hunger and satiety, which may partly explain this.
However, there is one major part of this equation that has not been looked at until now: diet.
A recent study published in the journal Sleep Medicine details some of my recent work exploring relationships between habitual sleep and health. This study examined nutritional profiles from ~450 women and compared the dietary data to a number of sleep-related variables. We studied both subjective sleep (measured with sleep diary) and objective sleep (measured with actigraphy). We looked at both nighttime sleep and daytime naps. What we found was surprising.
Basically, our study found two things:
1. There was a significant relationship between less sleep (verified objectively) and more intake of fat. It didn't matter which kind of fat -- all fats were associated with less sleep.
2. There was an even stronger relationship between more reports of napping (but not actual naps verified by objective methods) with fat intake, as well as with intake of nutrients found in meat. We think that since this relationship was with subjective but not objective naps, this could mean that people who eat more fat and meat are experiencing more sleepiness, even if they are actually sleeping less.
What was especially interesting about this pattern was that this controlled for age (not just one age group driving results), socioeconomic status (not just poorer people eating worse and sleeping worse), BMI (this was independent of weight), total gram amount eaten (it wasn't just that they were eating more), and exercise (it wasn't just that they were less active).
Also of note, there was NO relationship with intake of carbohydrates, even though previous data suggests that sleep-deprived people crave more carbohydrates.
Since these findings were correlational, we can't determine whether the short sleep (or sleepiness) caused more fat and meat intake or eating fat and meat makes you sleep less (and feel sleepier).
However, we conclude that less sleep is associated with eating more fat -- independent of the relationship with obesity. Also, eating more fat (and meat) was associated with feeling more sleepy.
See more in PUBLICATIONS.
However, there is one major part of this equation that has not been looked at until now: diet.
A recent study published in the journal Sleep Medicine details some of my recent work exploring relationships between habitual sleep and health. This study examined nutritional profiles from ~450 women and compared the dietary data to a number of sleep-related variables. We studied both subjective sleep (measured with sleep diary) and objective sleep (measured with actigraphy). We looked at both nighttime sleep and daytime naps. What we found was surprising.
Basically, our study found two things:
1. There was a significant relationship between less sleep (verified objectively) and more intake of fat. It didn't matter which kind of fat -- all fats were associated with less sleep.
2. There was an even stronger relationship between more reports of napping (but not actual naps verified by objective methods) with fat intake, as well as with intake of nutrients found in meat. We think that since this relationship was with subjective but not objective naps, this could mean that people who eat more fat and meat are experiencing more sleepiness, even if they are actually sleeping less.
What was especially interesting about this pattern was that this controlled for age (not just one age group driving results), socioeconomic status (not just poorer people eating worse and sleeping worse), BMI (this was independent of weight), total gram amount eaten (it wasn't just that they were eating more), and exercise (it wasn't just that they were less active).
Also of note, there was NO relationship with intake of carbohydrates, even though previous data suggests that sleep-deprived people crave more carbohydrates.
Since these findings were correlational, we can't determine whether the short sleep (or sleepiness) caused more fat and meat intake or eating fat and meat makes you sleep less (and feel sleepier).
However, we conclude that less sleep is associated with eating more fat -- independent of the relationship with obesity. Also, eating more fat (and meat) was associated with feeling more sleepy.
See more in PUBLICATIONS.
Monday, March 15, 2010
First Post
This is the first post; hopefully, the first of many.
For more information, see http://www.michaelgrandner.com.
For more information, see http://www.michaelgrandner.com.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)